for    
Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
November 14, 2008 at 13:44:10

Well Said 1   News 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 11/24/08:

From Technostress to Technohealth

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Erik Peper (about the author)     Page 2 of 7 page(s)

futurehealth.org     Permalink


 

their forearms while keyboarding and mousing. Sustaining a posture of tension—raised shoulders, arms reaching forward, rapid shallow breathing, and, sometimes, colder fingers—inhibits the body from relaxation and places the employee at risk of injury.  This increased arousal maintains a catabolic/ergothrophic state in which regeneration is constrained.  Only when a person relaxes and feels safe does muscle tension decrease and breathing slows. Both psychological as well as physical relaxation promotes the anabolic/trophotropic state during which psychological and physical regeneration may occur (Nixon, 1989).


            Both psychological and physical regeneration facilitate technohealth.  For example, consider your own patterns of computer equipment use when you wait in anticipation, with your arm extended, finger lifted and ready to click the mouse button.  Ask yourself how often while waiting in anticipation does your breathing become more shallow and rapid? Lack of somatic awareness during computer use is a major contributing factor to the development of work-related discomfort. Shumay & Peper (1995) have shown that when working at the keyboard subjects were unaware of their shoulder muscle tension as indicated by a low. (20-25%) correlation between the subjective rating of tension and actual surface electromyographic muscle activity recorded from their trapezius and deltoid muscles.  A more important point relevant for understanding technostress was that almost all participants studied thought that their muscles were relaxed when they were sitting correctly at the computer, even though they were tense (Peper et al 2006). Whereas ergonomic changes are necessary, they are insufficient for transforming technostress into technohealth. Employees need to change their somatic patterns and workstyle to reduce stress and enhance health. 


From technostress to technohealth: A training protocol


            After implementing a six-session training intervention at the worksite which incorporated biofeedback, Peper et al (2004) demonstrated that employees report significant improvement in their health.  The detailed training protocol and methodology has been described in the book, Muscle Biofeedback at the Computer, by Peper and Gibney, 2006.  This technohealth intervention is rooted in a systems perspective, where preventing technostress and the specific symptoms associated with repetitive strain injury (RSI) results from a collaboration between the employee, managers and the corporation.  The many components that contribute to shifting technostress to technohealth are illustrated in Figure 3.


 


Figure 3.  The multiple factors that contribute to the prevention of repetitive strain injury and technostress.  The responsibilities are shared with both the employee and the employer.


            The technohealth training intervention consisted of six weekly, two-hour group sessions consisting of an educational component as well as practice of muscle tension awareness and control as measured by surface electromyography (SEMG) (see Table 1 for detailed outline of group training sessions).  The practice component included using SEMG measurements for demonstrating increased tension during data entry and, for practicing slow diaphragmatic breathing during computer work.  Additionally, participants learned how to use SEMG feedback of muscle tension during on-going activities at their workstations.  Participants practiced both at home and at the worksite with portable SEMG equipment, focusing on: 1) raising awareness of shoulder tension while typing or mousing; 2) improving the ability to relax forearms by increasing the duration of micro-breaks; and, 3) noticing the effect of various body positions and ergonomic postures on subsequent SEMG activity (Peper & Gibney, 2000). 


            The educational component was labeled Healthy Computing and provided a general overview of technohealth concepts that included: somatic awareness, stress management, psycho-social support, ergonomic principles, work style, vision care, regeneration, and strength and flexibility training. In addition, the intervention provided group support as well as supervision in learning to apply these skills personally or with others.


            Participants in the technohealth intervention were responsible for keeping logs of shorter or longer duration breaks while working at the computer, which they identified as micro-, meso-, and macro-breaks. An example of a micro-break was dropping one’s hands on the lap and reducing forearm muscle tension for one or two seconds. An example of a meso-break was stopping to stretch the arms or even the total body for five to 20 seconds.  A macro-break was taking time out to move the whole body such as going for a walk for several minutes. Trainees were also encouraged to augment their awareness by installing on their computer an ‘interrupt program’ designed for alerting the users to take breaks at set intervals.  Finally, each participant was asked to transfer what they had


 

learned to other by coaching other co-workers on the best methods for utilizing the knowledge and skills gained from the program as well as using the portable SEMG biofeedback equipment for directly monitoring excessive muscle tension while computing.  All participants verbally reported during the group training sessions that they had increased the frequency of taking breaks, practicing with SEMG biofeedback equipment and, teaching others what they had learned.


            At the conclusion of the study, the Technohealth Experimental and Control Group subjects were each mailed or emailed post-intervention rating forms.  The forms included a work-related symptom and work style questionnaire in which they rated their self-report changes as compared to the beginning of the training.  Completed post-intervention forms provided the data for comparing intervention effectiveness.  For example, employees from departments without co-workers who participated in the program had increased numbers of worker’s compensation injury claims.  More evidence of the technohealth intervention impact is presented in greater detail in the results section below.


Table 1: Syllabus of Six Week Coaches Training Program


Session 1


         Introduction and presentation of the components that underlie Healthy Computing (Peper & Gibney, 2000).


         Demonstration using multimodal biofeedback of physiological response patterns that occur during typing and mousing with emphasis on: lack of awareness, muscle bracing of the deltoid and trapezius, absence of micro-breaks, emotional reactivity with electrodermal activity and respiration pattern changes (Peper et al, 2003).


         Demonstration and training with a Myotrac™, single-channel portable electromyography (EMG), for monitoring from the deltoid, trapezius, and forearm muscles.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

Erik Peper, Ph.D. is an international authority on biofeedback and self-regulation. He is Professor and Co-Director of the Institute for Holistic Healing Studies, Department of Health Education. He is President of the Biofeedback Foundation of (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, Futurehealth

Powered by Populum