Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites   No comments
Articles

Why do you need training to effectively incorporate psychophysiological assessments and biofeedback-based interventions

By       Message Richard A. Sherman PhD     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

futurehealth.org Headlined to H3 6/11/10

 

Why do you need training to effectively incorporate psychophysiological assessments and biofeedback-based interventions into your practice...

and how you do choose which course is best for you?*

By Richard A. Sherman, Ph.D.

Everyone planning to include psychophysiological assessments and biofeedback interventions in his or her practice needs, at the very least, to take a basic course in biofeedback. A good course will help you understand the relationships between the feedback display, the physiology being recorded, and the disorder being assessed and then treated. Misunderstanding these relationships along with ignorance of how to incorporate biofeedback into a treatment has resulted in numerous failures of otherwise efficacious biofeedback-based interventions.

Many people feel that basic courses are unnecessary because they think the devices are so sophisticated they can practically work themselves. Others think that because their licensing boards include biofeedback as a technique within their scopes of practice, the minimal exposure to biofeedback they received in typical graduate programs (perhaps augmented by a few hours of training by a manufacturer) provides all the information they need. This simply isn't the case as the time required to address many crucial concepts in sufficient depth isn't there. Courses provided by instrument manufacturers frequently do a fine job teaching people how to use of a specific device but not how to competently incorporate the device into a psychophysiological assessment or biofeedback based intervention within a multimodal treatment regime.

Sadly, many people who have never had an adequate biofeedback education waste their own and their patients' time. Studies by myself and, unfortunately, insurance companies show that many clinicians, regardless of their clinical degree, who are undereducated in biofeedback get results no better than the placebo effect, but think they are doing a great job.

Another problem is that people practicing biofeedback who have not had a basic course in it are unaware of the strengths and weaknesses of biofeedback applications for specific disorders. They can apply the wrong type of biofeedback, use it incorrectly, or use and charge for treatments that have not been shown to work for the disorder they are treating. This information can only come from a course or review of the literature by an expert.

So what should you look for in a basic biofeedback course?

Five key factors to consider include (a) depth of material presented, (b) demonstration of many types of equipment and software used for a wide variety of problems, (c) availability of a skilled professional to answer your questions during and after the course, (d) whether the course has been independently evaluated and approved by a variety of well recognized professional organizations, and (e) your actual costs to take the course relative to your motivation to study on your own.

The course you are considering needs to allot sufficient time and depth to cover the material. You can't cover basic general biofeedback in much less than 40 hours. No course much shorter than that will give you the depth you need. Some courses teach you how use biofeedback devices appropriately but don't teach you to how to incorporate psychophysiological assessments and biofeedback-based interventions into typical clinical, coaching, and educational practices. A good course will include movies or extensive demonstrations showing a variety of assessments and interventions being performed with real patients.

Look for a course that demonstrates the use of many types of hardware and software so you can make your own comparisons of the devices and their software. There are a great many devices available which have different degrees of flexibility and tremendous differences in cost. You could easily spend a fortune buying a device with far more capabilities than you need or with software you can't easily use. Some courses concentrate on teaching participants how to use the hardware and software for one particular device. This means you won't have a good idea what alternatives are available when it comes time to purchase equipment.

Most biofeedback courses are set at one of three levels: (a) general/basic, (b) basic with technique-based subspecialty emphasis, and (c) disorder-based specialized/advanced. For most people, the way to begin learning about biofeedback is with a general biofeedback course to get an overview of what the field is all about and how biofeedback is incorporated into treatments.

However, if you have seen an introductory slide show and have sufficient knowledge of biofeedback to know that you are only likely to perform a specialized type of biofeedback using one main technique, such as EEG or pelvic floor muscle tension, then you can begin with a basic course concentrating on these techniques. Be sure that the course still includes a good overview of biofeedback, so you can understand where it fits into the field.

If you work primarily with one particular class of disorders (such as ADHD or chronic pain) and only want to use biofeedback for that single class of disorder, you should take an advanced course after you take a good basic course. Advanced courses cover many biofeedback techniques as applied to a single class of disorders. This is where you learn the detailed physiology of the disorder and many behavioral approaches to them in relation to other techniques.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Richard A. Sherman received his doctorate in psychobiology from New York University in 1973. He has accrued over thirty-five years of experience teaching and performing research and clinical work in behavioral medicine and related fields. Dr. (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines