![]() |
|
|
Add to My Group
September 27, 2009 at 19:57:26
Smile Anatomy: Emotional Self Regulation and Facial Expression Muscle Measurement and TrainingBy Rob Kall (about the author) Page 2 of 7 page(s) Over
100 years ago a debate on one of the most important aspects of human
emotion began. What comes first? Does something which happens in our
environment, like the screeching of tires, set off a racing heart beat
so we feel the pounding in the chest and become aware of the emotion?
Or do we hear the tires, feel the fear and become fearful, thus setting
the heart racing? Pioneer
psychologist, William James, took this position in the debate, " An
emotion of fear, for example, or surprise, is not a direct effect of
these objects's presence on the mind, but an effect of that still
easier effect, the bodily commotion which the object suddenly excites;
so that, were this bodily commotion suppressed, we should not so much
feel fear as call the situation fearful; we should not feel surprise..,
but coldly recognize that the object was indeed astonishing. ...the
mere giving way to tears, for example, or to the outward expression of
an anger-fit, will result for the moment in making the inner grief or
anger more acutely felt." James'
following observation spells out the heart of the pattern activation
component of the Happiness Response model of emotional self regulation.
"...Action seems to follow feeling, but really action and feeling go
together; and by regulating the action, which is under the more direct
control of the will, we can indirectly regulate the feeling, which is
not. ...Thus the sovereign voluntary path to cheerfulness, if our
spontaneous cheerfulness be lost, is to sit up cheerfully, to look
round cheerfully, and to act and speak as if cheerfulness were already
there. If such conduct does not make you soon feel cheerful, nothing
else on that occasion can. "So to feel brave, act as if we were
brave, use all our will to that end. .... and a courage-fit will very
likely replace the fit of fear. ...To feel kindly toward a person to
whom we have been inimical, the only way is more or less deliberately
to smile, to make sympathetic inquiries, and to force ourselves to say
genial things. ...One hearty laugh together will bring enemies into a
closer communion of heart than hours spent on both sides in inward
wrestling with the mental demon of uncharitable feeling. ...To wrestle
with a bad feeling only pins our attention on it, and keeps it still
fastened in the mind; whereas, if we act as if from some better feeling, the old bad feeling soon folds its tent ... and silently steals away." The debate is still alive, but more researchers have, like James, now take the position that both sides can be true. Making Faces Can Increase Body Muscle Strength Several
researchers have proved that grimacing actually increases hand
strength. Making a face produces a direct effect on a seemingly
un-related part of the body. Just as grimacing intensifies grip
strength, making strong facial expressions can intensify experience of
other emotions. Recent
computerized assessment of multiple site Facial EMG activity has
demonstrated its superiority over observer visual assessment of
subject's emotions. During
the past 10 years many studies have repeatedly shown high correlations
between facial muscle activity and emotional state. Fair and Schwartz
reported that normals show stronger zygomatic response during positive
affective imagery. Depressed patients exhibit stronger corrugator
responses and weaker zygomatic responses. This seems analogous to the
pattern physical therapists encounter when using biofeedback to
rehabilitate weakened or atrophied muscles. One muscle (like the
zygomaticus) is underactive. The antagonist muscle (the corrugator) is
overactive and must be voluntarily inhibited and controlled. We
have been using Zygomaticus activation and Corrugator muscle inhibition
EMG feedback for positive affect facilitation, intensification and
"smile rehabilitation. Prospective data is being collected. When
subjects are instructed to maximally activate the zygomaticus, readings
range from 12 microvolts (100-200 hz bandpass) to 150 microvolts.
Practice appears to dramatically increase contraction strength above
initial levels. When subjects are induced to laugh or smile naturally,
their EMG activity tends to be higher than during volitional efforts at
maximal zygomatic contraction, or even maximal efforts to smile. This
suggests an inhibitory process at work, perhaps similar to what occurs
during the early stages of thermal biofeedback training, when efforts
to produce vasodilation usually result in cooling of the fingers.
Further zygomaticus increase training, coupled with biofeedback
monitored smiling and laughing to facilitate subject "connectedness"
with the awareness of psychophysiological dimensions of positive
emotion seems to lead to the ability to equal and then exceed automatic
or "involuntary" positive emotional response EMG activation. Caccioppo
mentions one Japanese study in which a group of human cadavers were
dissected and two percent of them were found to be lacking their
zygomaticus-- the primary smile muscle. Were they atrophied through
lack of use or missing from birth. Emotion
researcher Sylvan Tomkins suggests that most people rarely express
pure, uninhibited emotions. They transform, inhibit and modify feelings
based on their acculturation. The feelings end up being blocked and are
never really felt. Tomkins suggests that breathing and vocalization are
the most strongly blocked. The facial muscles are used to prevent the
feelings from being expressed. Instead of jumping and shouting
joyously, we smile with drawn cheeks and pursed lips. We need to be
able to control our emotional displays in some situations. The problem
is, some people don't learn how to modulate the release of uninhibited
emotional expression. They are either totally inhibiting or totally
emoting. Raw emotional expression can be frightening, like an "alien
force within" if it is only released on rare occasions-- during
intoxication or under extreme circumstances. For feelings to be tamed,
one must be capable of varying mixtures of voluntary and uninhibited
control. One has to be able to modulate emotional letting go-- ten
percent sometimes, ninety five percent other times. Practice can help. If
a positive experience opportunity presents itself, one must be able to
quickly make the most of it by connecting with it as completely as
possible yet appropriate, emotionally, mentally and physically. It
takes training and practice to learn how to comfortably express and
experience deep feelings. I
often ask seminar participants to smile at the very beginning of my
presentation. A few don't smile at all. Some scowl. Some barely smile,
and some let loose with strong smiles at the least excuse. I only allow
about three seconds and then I say, "Stop. If you didn't smile yet, you
lost your chance." A quick, strong positive experience reflex is
necessary to get the most out of each minute. We
are conditioned to experience good feelings in response to the smile
and warm, happy sounds, since most of the time, smiles and happy or
pleasure sounds and actions are genuine parts of positive experiences
which produce good feelings.
Rob is the organizer founder of the Winter Brain, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology and StoryCon Meetings. He is president of Futurehealth, Inc., Publisher of more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
Comments The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.
To view all comments:
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
How simple a smile, and yet how complex.
by Gerri George on Friday, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:22:59 PM
the thing about studying smiling and positive experiences...
by Rob Kall on Monday, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:13:35 PM
|
|
|||||||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2010, Futurehealth |