Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend (4 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites   1 comment
Exclusive to Futurehealth:

The Narrative Paradigm and the New Year

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Lewis Mehl-Madrona       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 12/31/11

Author 428
Become a Fan
  (35 fans)

It's New Year's Eve, almost 2012!   The year the Mayans ran out of space to keep going on their calendar and had a good laugh about what people in the future would make of that!   I wanted to begin the year talking about the narrative paradigm, which I have embraced wholeheartedly and hope to be helpful in its development.


The narrative paradigm arises from the realization that all things human exist in the form of stories.   Our brain stores and manages information in a storied form.   We communicate most effectively with others through telling stories.   We live our lives through the performance of roles that we come to understand through listening to stories that inform us about how we are supposed to live.   We change through hearing stories about other people's lives and trying them on for our lives to see if we could do what the hero in the story did.


Psychotherapy involves the negotiation of stories.   In my practice, I've learned never to ask "Why?"   I don't ask people why they do what they do.   I assume that they, like me, haven't a clue.   We like to ascribe motives to people and we imagine that they know why they do what they do.   We wait breathless at the end of crime dramas for the suspect to explain why.   We want a wrap up.   We want to know their motive. We need narrative closure.   We want to tie together the story into a neat package -- Bob killed Mary because she cheated on him and he was jealous, for example.     However, my actual experience is that most of us (including me) don't have a clue why we do what we do.   As children, when an adult asks us the "Why?" question, we try to make up an answer that will please or satisfy the adult or minimize our punishment.   Instead I try to ask "How?" questions.   "How does that work?"   "How did you know to do that?"


I've also learned not to give people advice.   People have actually explored all the possible answers that I could imagine without being in their lives.   They've already thought about everything I could suggest.   The only possible good suggestions could come from other people in their lives who have known them for years, which a therapist never will.   People don't need advice.   Rather, they need assistance to explore what stories they have about how to live that keep them from following the advice that they already know they should follow.


So, I try to find the story behind the position, belief, fear, stance, or attitude that people have that keeps them from changing.


Rather than interpret other people's lives and stories, I try to maintain a stance of appreciative inquiry -- asking lots of questions from a standpoint of appreciating how well the person has negotiated their life and wondering how they were able to do as   well as they did.   I try to balance the positives -- to find positives in stories that are presented as all negative.   Sometimes it's even important to find a negative in a story that's presented as all positive.   My hero in all this is the character, Columbo, a detective who never stopped politely asking respectful questions until he solved the crime.


There's no answers; just stories; no truths, just many perspectives.


What's liberating about this?   If we're shaped through stories and stories shape our brains (through in part our performance of the roles taught to us by those stories), then there are no diagnoses, no DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association) as absolute truth or fact (rather, just one more classification system that's more or less useful depending upon the circumstances and situation), no defective people, just stories that work better or worse depending upon the circumstances and the situation.   Our job becomes helping people become aware of the stories that are shaping them and influencing them.   Then we can learn how to change those stories.


Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Lewis Mehl-Madrona graduated from Stanford University School of Medicine and completed residencies in family medicine and in psychiatry at the University of Vermont. He is the author of Coyote Medicine, Coyote Healing, Coyote Wisdom, and (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Drug Abuse Prevention; Why do the American media avoid discussing research findings? (12679 views)

Day 12 of the Australian Journey (12623 views)

The Inflammatory Theory of Depression (7970 views)

The Debate Over Obamacare (7387 views)

Avatars and Hearing Voices Therapy (7118 views)

Heroes, Joseph Campbell, and Jordan Peterson (4344 views)

Total Views: 52121