Share on Facebook 4 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing

Articles

From Technostress to Technohealth

By       Message Erik Peper       (Page 7 of 11 pages)     Permalink      No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

futurehealth.org Headlined to H1 11/24/08
Author 540

"    Assignment of homework that included working in pairs as coaches, practicing the many skills and using the EMG.

 

Results from intervention program

   After 6 weeks, the Technohealth Experimental Group as compared to the Control Group reported a significant overall reduction in work-related symptoms [F(8, 19)=3.254, p<.01].   The report of symptoms reduced significantly included muscle strain of the head [ t(23) = 2.24 p < 0.05], neck and shoulder [ t(19) = 2.98, p < .01], wrist and hands [ t(22) = 3.02 p < 0.01], arms [t(22) = 2.16, p < .05], and overall tiredness [t( 24) = .2.35, p < .05].   There were no significant reductions in symptoms reported for the eyes [t(23) = .69, p > .05], back [ t(23) = 1.63, p > .05], and legs [ t(22) = 1.60, p > .05]. See Figure 4.  

 

 


(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

 

Figure 4. Self-report of symptom changes as compared to the beginning of the training program (SD is represented by the vertical black line for each area of discomfort).

 

 

 

 

The Technohealth Experimental Group as compared to the Control Group reported a meaningful overall improvement in work-style changes [F (5, 23)=5.232, p<.001]. Significantly more micro-breaks [ t(25) = 3.74, p < .01], meso-breaks [ t(22) = 5.47, p < .01], and macro-breaks [ t(20) = 4.16, p < .01] were reported. The Experimental Group as compared to the Control Group also practiced more diaphragmatic breathing [ t(22) = 3.36, p < .01] and applied more ergonomic principles at the workstation [ t(21) = 4.56, p < .01]. See Figure 5.

 

 

 


(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

 

Figure 5. Self-report of work style changes as compared to the beginning of the training program (SD is represented by the vertical black line for each work-style).

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

futurehealth.org

Erik Peper, Ph.D. is an international authority on biofeedback and self-regulation. He is Professor and Co-Director of the Institute for Holistic Healing Studies, Department of Health Education. He is President of the Biofeedback Foundation of (more...)
 

Erik Peper Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

From Technostress to Technohealth (4186 views)

Repetitive Strain Injury; Computer User Injury With Biofeedback: Assessment and Training Protocol (2107 views)

Total Views: 6293